Pages

Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts

Thursday, May 13, 2010

The Ugly Face of the New Global Paradigm












Economy

Related dossier


- Nourishing obscurity: "Where does the money come from?", by James Higham

- The Market Ticker: "But You Love Bailing Out Greece, Right?" - Hat Tip: James Higham

- Telegraph: "ECB risks its reputation and a German backlash over mass bond purchases"

- Bild: "We are the schmucks of Europe yet again!", by Nikolaus Blome

- WSJ: "A €750 Billion EU Feint?", by Terence Roth

- AiM: "Manipulation, Not Error, Behind Market Plunge", by Cliff Kincaid

- Asia Times: "The tarping of Euroland"


Climate Scam

Related dossier


"Greenism"

- Matador 94: "Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in on Chicago Climate Exchange"

- The August Review: "Obama is merely a fop for the global elite", by Judi McLeod

More on 'big fish' Maurice Strong, operating on the interfaces of transnational progressivism, climate alarmism, and the economic and financial collapse, on the Greenism file.

More tips warmly welcomed.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Europe Under Siege by 'Flying Sand Paper'

After five days of thousands of stranded passengers, numerous airports in chaos and an economic loss now dwarfing the damage sustained as a result of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on New York World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it is now transpiring that the European national authorities have severely mismanaged the eruption of the Icelandic Eyjafjallajökull volcano.

Eyeing initially European transnational entities like Eurocontrol and the Commission's Transport Department, word now has it that the responsibility for closing air space rests entirely with the national authorities.

While safety is an imperative in the industry, these measures of closing swathes of European airspace for days on end, appears to have been taken without the slightest consideration for economic consequences.

The English edition of NRC newspaper has this tonight ... (Climategate, anyone?)

"EU can't be blamed for closing European airspace"
Airlines have complained that the decision to close Europe's airspace was based on computer models, rather than on factual information regarding the level of volcanic ash. Matthias Ruete, the top-official of the European Commission's transport department (...)  said the US uses a different system in similar situations. 
"Don't fly over the volcano," is how Ruete described that system. "If you look at the statistics there is no reason to assume that is any less safe," he added. (...)  It is unlikely Europe will adopt the American system any time soon, even if it is just as safe. In the US, the authorities only issue advisories to airlines, which they are free to ignore at their own peril. "We are Europeans," Redeborn of Eurocontrol said. "We like to regulate."
Many are now looking to Europe regarding the ban's financial consequences. Some are even asking whether Europe should bail out airlines the way it did troubled banks. This question too is based on a misconception, however. National governments, not the European Union, kept banks afloat with capital injections. Still, the commission could choose to relax regulations governing state aid. Competition commissioner Joaquín Almunia has already said he would consider such a move.
It is unlikely Europe will ever adopt the American system any time soon, even if it is just as safe, for the reason alone that it is the American system.

What is it these people don't understand in the words 'tax payer'? What's up with the disdain for economic considerations?

The answer is simple: the general European has grown up to believe there's a tree somewhere in the center of his country, which when shaken is dropping gold coins. The relation between paying taxes and the redistribution of it by the state, has purposely been severed.

The governing oligarchies are made up of collectivist statists who look with disdain upon the tax paying middle classes and their shop-keepers' mentality.

Something tells me we haven't heard the last of this matter yet. The angry man in the volcano is far from done.

Updated

Telegraph: "Volcanic ash cloud: Virgin boss Branson criticises flight ban as 'wrong decision' "

The Virgin Atlantic boss said the airline lost about £50 million in six days and called for compensation for the industry. Speaking in central London ahead of the Virgin London Marathon, Sir Richard said: ''We've never asked for Government help in 25 years. We didn't even ask for Government help after 9/11. We took it on the chin. ''But I think on this occasion this was very much a Government decision to ground the planes and we would suggest that the Government should compensate the industry. ''Behind the scenes our engineers and all the experts were telling us that there was no danger at all to flying and that the danger would have been if we had flown close to Iceland through the volcano. (...) ''The experts in the industry were saying it was safe to fly. 'A blanket ban of the whole of Europe was not the right decision. (...) >>>

Apr 24, 2010
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Are We Repeating the Mistakes of the 70s?

We wouldn't be bailing out failing companies anymore.
We wouldn't foist taxes on employment.

Or set minimum wages in times of rising unemployment.
Or raise taxes in a failing economy.
Or build up dificits and offload the debt on our children.

Why then are doing Keynesian economics?
Be afraid, be very afraid ... because it's not as if we don't know any better!






Professor Peter Klein, University of Michigan, talks about the return of an ugly monster that refuses to die.  Hat Tip: Liberty Pen.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

The Coup of State on the Economy in Perspective

In America the organizations who are helping us getting our human heads around the unprecedented, astronomical figures involving the various economic stimuli, are the Tea Party Movement (sites here and here) and Stop Spending our Future.

The latter has published following information in helping us reducing it all to a more or less human scale: fasten seat belts for this one!




In the Netherlands the movement to watch is Stop het Potverteren/Kind van de Rekening, initiated by Cindy Schneider. Keep an eye on the Manifestatie tab for planned demos in The Hague.

Don't forget to sign the available petitions, for what that is worth.

Suggestions and tips are invited from all over the globe! Do let us know what's happening in your corner!

Our children and grandchildren will be lumbered from birth with unprecendented national debts. What will that make them? The empowered generations to ensure the spread of universalism, individual rights, prosperity and liberty around the globe ... or the opposite?

What do you think?

- Filed on Articles in "Economy and Monetary File" - 

Sunday, March 22, 2009

The Postmodern Origin of the Financial Crisis

This needs further maturing, but it's been quite a revelation! With hindsight it would have been a surprise had some Postmodern lunacy not been at the bottom of the financial crisis!

The Big Picture (hat tip: 12010 AM The Big Talker Radio) just published the full text of a speech recently delivered in Toronto by Paul Volcker, former US Federal Reserve Board chairman, and now a member of the Obama team advisory board on the economy. A digest of the main points is available on Articles and the full text is here.

The bursting of the sub prime mortgage bubble is evidently the direct cause, but there's a not so obvious, even more profound explanation underlying it.

This is attributable to the deviation from Aristotelian principles on the academic level. Anthony Rizzi of the Institute of Advanced Physics in his ground breaking book "Science Before Science" has been explaining why it is so vital for science to return to the level of the real world. In this interview Rizzi explains part of the hiatus physics has in explaining reality:

"Technically, modern physics is focused on physical beings (that is, changeable beings), and then only insofar as they are quantitative. Hence, modern physics by its very methods leaves much of reality behind."

Another part of the problem can be summed up in the Postmodern habit of not properly identifying. On the humanities level it's a world that thrives on false analogy. In science theories remain stuck on the level of ideas; the hypothetical is never reduced to the sensory level. Because of it, any number of silly fallacies and blatant misunderstandings occur.

One such is the belief in amateur cosmology circles that reality consists in twelve parallel universes resting on a membrane, just because theoretical physicists' calculations have said so.

Apparently such enormities are not limited to the nebulous confines of the ivory tower: they have now spilled over into the real world of haute finance and bread and butter economics where they have been wreaking havoc on the global economy.

To list a few other common fallacies:

- The notion that an object only exists if it can be measured;

- The extraordinary error of ascribing matters occurring on the macro level (including philosophy), in terms of the erratic behavior of particles in quantum mechanics;

- That historical events are a natural phenomenon, dependent on the course of human evolution (otherwise known as 'progress');

- The old wives tale that moral relativism is infallible, because Albert Einstein's genius as a physicist is beyond question.

But here's the thing. You cannot use chemistry to do algebra; you cannot use biology to do politics; you cannot use genetics to do cosmology; you cannot use theoretical physics to do philosophy; and you cannot use French to do English!

The law of identity is not negotiable: A=A, always! A is not sometimes B, depending on your vantage point, as relativist Postmodernists are fond to argue.

What are we talking about, relative to the financial crisis? Let's borrow a direct quote from the Volcker speech:

There was so much opaqueness, so many complications and misunderstandings involved in very complex financial engineering by people who, in my opinion, did not know financial markets. They knew mathematics. They thought financial markets obeyed mathematical laws. They have found out differently now.

You know, they all said these events only happen once every hundred years. But we have “once every hundred years” events happening every year or two, which tells me something is the matter with the analysis. So I think we have a problem which is not an ordinary business cycle problem. It is much more difficult to get out of and it has shaken the foundations of our financial institutions. The system is broken (...)
Consider the neologism: financial engineering. I wonder where that stems from? Sounds to me very much like a sociologist had been moonlighting as a mathematician and got himself outsourced to work as a banker (or something) ...

To be continued.

N.B. Margaret Thatcher knew what few people are aware of today: economics is not an exact science!

- Filed on Articles in "Economics and Monetary File" -

History Happened Last Week, and We Missed It!



In an earlier video Glenn explained what is one trillion dollars. Here's a post on The Foundry on that self same subject: Morning Bell: Taxpayers Should Be More Than a Little Scared.

Just one small piece of advice from this point onwards ... ignore the MSM completely. It's One Huge Smoke Screen to deflect attention from what's really going on. History just happened, and we missed it ... thanks to the loyal media!

In fact, whenever there's lots of buzzz and hot air about absolutely nothing - like the Great 0 on Jay Leno - there's a very good chance something major is happening elsewhere. So the next time the press from hell is besides themselves with hysteria, start looking! It's silly season ... perpetually!

- Filed on Articles in "The Press From Hell" -

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Fixing the Economy, the Really, Really Hard Way

The shocking severity and magnitude of the credit crisis - or perhaps a better word would be the Politically Correct Crisis - has caused the traditional Left and the Pragmatists, including the Center-Right statist guard, to once again grab for the wrong, long-bankrupt tools to "fix the economy".

While the conclusion seems justified that political correctness is no longer an innocent toy for social make-ability in the hands of progressivism, they're calling - as by knee-jerk reaction - for more regulation, state control and objectively false remedies, blaming the perfidity of capitalism for its failure. Here's why Keynesian methods don't work:




Washington Post: "Obama Expands Stimulus Goals - As Economic Outlook Grows More Dire, Early Target for Job Growth Is Bolstered"

President-elect Barack Obama has expanded his goals for a massive federal stimulus package to keep pace with the increasingly grim economic outlook, aiming to create or preserve at least 3 million jobs over the next two years. (...) With liberal and conservative economists calling on the government to spend $800 billion to $1.3 trillion to stanch the bleeding, the greater danger to the nation, Obama was told, lies in doing too little rather than too much. (...) >>>

One cannot help pondering the definition of stupidity: repeating the same thing over and over, each time expecting a different outcome.

Perhaps the obvious answer to the obstinate economic policies leading to failure is, that Keynesianism is the only answer politicians have to economic crisis. That is, short of taking the brakes off, which would make market-mechanisms the heroes of this piece instead of them and that, would never do!

Dutch Socialist Finance Minister Bos went from rock-bottom approval ratings just two months ago to Political Figure of the Year 2008 for socializing the banking sector ... FDR is still credited for saving the US from The Great Depression! Long live the irreconomics of John Maynard Keynes!

- Filed on Articles in "Economics" -

Monday, November 17, 2008

Just What the World Needs: Another NGO, the G20

What's with this G20 summit last weekend in Washington? Who are the G20? The MSM as usual abdicated their duty - did what they do best: what they cannot spin or obfuscate, they bury.

Initial research learns that the G20 have emerged from the the Doha Trade Round, set up on the basis of a Brazilian initiative in the run-up to the Cancun Conference. Apart of the states making up the G8, G20 member states include Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the EU and European Central Bank, and the NGOs IMF, the World Bank and their Development Committee.

With the notable exception of South Korea neither of these countries has a principled tradition of free market capitalism. All, until recently suffered, or are still bowing under the rule of theocrats, autocrats, dictators, a collective, or all of the above.

The Third World is slowly crawling on to the world stage, out of its largely self-imposed, poverty ridden, Marxism or theocracy driven lethargy. But swathes of Latin America are already in danger of regressing back into darkness, even before having fully emerged from it; Socialist as well as Islamic beginnings are simply antithetical to individual rights, the moral requirement for a fully functioning free-market democracy.

And then there's good, old chauvinist commie prop. The Heritage Foundation here reports on the PR stunt China pulled just ahead of the summit!

What can be expected of such a global, economic governing body? They cannot even be trusted to handle a trade round, let alone lead, run and reform the world's economic and financial system. How would they do that ... by committee, by revelation, or by decree?!

The situation is hardly better in the state of Europe, which is steadily desolving into a post-democratic, Hegelian Absolute. European states are challenging American leadership of the global economy, calling on President-Elect Obama to embrace Europe as America’s equal partner.

on The Brussels Journal had this to say last week: "The idea behind this new man-to-man relationship with Washington was hatched by (surprise, surprise) France, which currently holds the EU’s six-month rotating presidency. French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner says the reason for establishing an equal transatlantic partnership is that “the world has changed.”

Europe has suddenly realized that the United States “is not the only one concerned by the world’s problems. The European Union has become more resolute…. We don’t want to play a secondary role any more,” says Kouchner," who is an experienced NGO builder (founder Doctors Without Borders).

On the economy the French - as most Europeans - can be fully trusted to commit a coup of state against the private sector. Self-regulation to solve all problems, it’s finished,” Sarkozy says. “Laissez-faire, it’s finished. The all-powerful market that is always right, it’s finished…. It is necessary then for the state to intervene.”


John Gizzi on Human Events goes as far as saying the G20 meeting was in effect Sarkozy's summit, clarifying "that the goal of the French President, was future international economic summits that include many more nations beside the traditional G8 industrial titans. His secondary goal was to assimilate discretionary bondholders (countries that hold U.S. debt) into the summits (...)

John Gizzi gives us the gist of what emerged from the summit: "(...) Sarkozy did get this long-stated desire of a "college of supervisors" for oversight of the books of major financial institutions operating across international borders. Moreover, the world leaders agreed that their systems would submit to periodic review by the International Monetary Fund (whose Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn, former French finance minister who was tapped for the IMF position by—you guessed it!—Nicolas Sarkozy).


A tougher line by ratings agencies on exhorbitant compensation for executives–either voluntary or regulatory—was called for in the final communiqué of the G20. Again, this was an issue doggedly pursued by Sarkozy.

With much of the actual work of the summit done behind closed doors, the media has had to rely on reports from anonymous sources on who said what to whom. Relying on such sources, the Washington Post pointed to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper as one who was particularly opposed to Sarkozy’s calls for greater global regulation over markets in sovereign nations.

We are looking at an entire round of talks stretching well into the next year. Apart from the above, nothing much emerged from present summit while outgoing President Bush acted as a forceful buffer against the anti capitalist onslaught. But as postmodern President-Elect Obama joins the company of Argentina, China and the other card-carrying members of the Grizzly 20 collective, we will soon all be reminded of which cloth that philosophy is a cut.

Related:

- "Hurray! It's the Weekend of Capitalism!"

- Images - Hat Tip: Barbay Live



- Filed in "Transnational Bankruptcy" and "The Economics and Monetary Dossier" -

Sunday, December 30, 2007

Of the Welfare State and Bankruptcy


When there is no money anymore, there is still money left!

There is nothing worse for our countries than the idea that any project, any social step can be financed anyhow. People expect always "more State". To the point that their behaviour seems to be the one of a teenager expecting to see his pocket money increase, because he believes it's his privilege.

Our countries' debts seem to frighten nobody. People who pretend to know something on this matter will answer you that USA's debt is much worse than ours, that every country is in debt and that doesn't matter at all.

One of the main reasons of this sense of irresponsibility is the fact that too many people pay no income taxes. Their logic is that a project which is free for them and pays back, can't be wrong and is a privilege, after all they voted for their representatives with that in mind! So people have a real tendency to vote for candidates who promise the most. The Welfare State!

Can this State go bankrupt? Noooo, are you kidding? State is eternal! The reality shows however that in this system, expenses become tremendous, and that our retirement funds are likely to serve as repayment.

But the most courageous and ethical politicians are labeled "anti-social" because they refuse to bail for such a system. And we can see that we are living a truly moral crisis directly linked to this financial crisis.

Now, there really is a risk of some of our countries going into bankruptcy! In this scenario, the bankrupt country would be managed by international organizations, its properties sold and such a country would loose its sovereignty.

Economists know that we are reaching a state of emergency. To get the debt resorted, people need to change their behaviour. We have to get rid of the citizen's selfishness which impoverishes the very people who try to take profit of the system!

The logic of the communicating vessels strongly contributed to the thought that it was always possible to find money to finance everything, usually giving someone an allowance by taking it from someone else's pocket. So What?

If a country spends 20 percent more than it "earns", then it must save this 20 percent. The goal is just the same as the one of a family which spends 20 percent more than its income. But, as it is the case in a family, there is a good debt and a bad debt.

The good one is when you borrow money to buy a house or some really needed good, like a car. You check that the monthly payment is affordable for you and, if it's the case, you can accept the debt.

Then there are bad debts. That's the sort our countries have accumulated these past 25 years or so. That's the "cricket" debt (see La Fontaine's Fable of the Ant and the Cricket), the debt you create when you borrow just for the sake of consuming, to get what you foolishly think you can't do without.

In our countries we used and abused these excuses to run into debt because social needs seemed to be so urgent. And it was so easy pretending to solve these social problems, distributing borrowed money instead of fighting their causes.

We have to understand that we have to begin reabsorbing the State debt RIGHT NOW. We have to understand that otherwise, our children will be the ones to pay for it. At least if they can! If it's not the case, the only solution will be decreasing retirement money.

Is it possible to better manage a country, spending 20 percent money less than now? YES! Countries like Canada or Sweden did it! How? Reforming our countries, beginning with a revaluation and hierarchization of their missions, auditing and arbitrating all the allowances distributed, in one word "restructuring" our countries.

- Filed on Articles in "The Economics and Monetary Dossier", cat. Economics -

 
RatePoint Business Reviews