Prof. Tim Congdon, an economist of 40 years in public policy studies has published an analysis of Britain's position in the EU. He brought the matter down to two essentials: 1. the continental collective state culture versus liberty philosophy rooted in individualism prevailing in the Anglo-Saxon world, and 2. the relative costs versus the benefits. The second question boiling down to the question: ‘Do we want a centralist, top down, federal state or a free trade club of independent nations?’
In Congdon's view, Britain should seek to recover its full independence from the EU for economic reasons alone. But he sees the philosophical case for withdrawal from the EU as even more basic and compelling than the economic:
"(...) our nation’s long-run commitments are to maintain the freedom of the individual in a society under the law. The current version of the EU has a quite different agenda (...) the EU is authoritarian and anti-democratic."
The implementation of the 'Semester' is dating back to June 17, 2010 when the European Council - made up by the national political leaders - adopted the Europe 2020 Strategy which provides "a framework to put the European economies on the path to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth." This is Orwell 1984 on crack. Mind the language, the subterfuge and the obfuscation!
"(...) the European Semester (...) governs the: implementation of fiscal policies under the Stability and Growth Pact to strengthen economic governance and ensure budgetary discipline, implementation of structural reforms in the context of Integrated Guidelines outlined in National Reform Programmes to ensure progress towards the agreed goals of the EU Strategy for Growth and Jobs ("Europe 2020")."
0 comments:
Post a Comment