Of "The October Surprise"

Okay, here it is, the live saver upon which the future of civilization rests (no irony intended). A technicality is never satisfactory, but at this stage anything will do to arouse those sensible people who still may be awakened from their irrational amorousness with The Messiah.

True believers on the other hand are so completely and utterly in thrall of the Obama that they would even vote for him, were he to adopt John McCain's policies (if only). Better proof that this is a personality cult - all about the man instead of the substance - could hardly be brought in evidence. The momentous event of the first black American President frankly deserves better than a closeted Marxist dream weaver.

- Caption: Obama commemorative coins minted in Birmingham's Jewellery Quarter -

We'll be posting short lists shortly, but all the 'isolated' instances of pernicious group think and associations with people who aren't precisely the paramours of individualism and limited government, make a forceful pattern - at least, to those who aren't totally transfixed by the man's magnetic cool. C'mon, it ain't healthy anymore ...

Here's the thing:

American Thinker: "This could be the game changer (updated)", by Thomas Lifson, editor

Someone with the unlikely name of Molotov Mitchell has produced a 10 minute and 52 second video (watch it below) that could well change the terms of the election -- if enough people watch it. (...) It makes accessible to the general public some of the serious questions about Obama's citizenship status that have been vetted almost exclusively in the conservative web world. (...) A lifelong Democrat who has held political office and been a committeeman, Philip Berg, has brought suit over the real questions raised by the absence of a valid Obama birth certificate. His narrative of the various questions Obama has refused to answer is devastating. (...) ".

Berg, Former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania "contrasts Obama's behavior when challenged (use perfectly valid legal technicalities to delay) with John McCain's full disclosure of all documentary evidence under a similar challenge (remember the flap over his birth in the Panama Canal Zone? -- who raised those questions, anyway?) (...)".

The only way Obama can satisfactorily respond is to release his supposed Hawaiian birth certificate. If he has it, why hasn't he released it? If he does release it, game over. So why drag this out on technical grounds? It doesn't make sense." (...) >>>

Indeed. One answer may lie in what Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs has been on about ...

Atlas Exclusive: "Final Report on Obama Birth Certificate Forgery - Change You Can Believe In"

Techdude delivers a final report that exceeds my wildest expectations. It is irrefutable, empirical evidence - Obama's birth certificate is a forgery. Why? Why a COLB (certificate of live birth) forgery? That is the question.

My deepest thanks and appreciation for Techdude's unwavering commitment to the truth despite the threats and harassment, the slashed tires and the dead animal on his porch.

Insofar as "techdude's" credentials, he is an active member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, American College of Forensic Examiners, The International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, International Information Systems Forensics Association - the list goes on. He's also a board certified as a forensic computer examiner, a certificated legal investigator, and a licensed private investigator. He has been performing computer based forensic investigations since 1993 (although back then it did not even have a formal name yet) and he has performed countless investigations since then.

Here is his analysis (...) >>>

Or listen to Pamela on the Obama Birth Certificate Forgery on Political Pistachio BlogTalkRadio.

Now for the updates on the American Thinker article:

Update: All the filings to date in the court action of Philip Berg are available here.

Update: Based on comments and email, it is evidently necessary to point out that Berg may or may not be correct in the factual assertions claimed in this video and, more importantly, in his court filings. Determining the factual basis is the responsibility of the court, based on filings provided by both parties. I have no way of knowing whether Berg is a kook on this issue or not.

The important point is that the Obama campaign has not chosen to confront Berg's claims in a straightforward manner. That is a fact. Posting two different electronic images of an alleged birth certificate does not carry weight in court. Nor do the opinions of organizations like factcheck.org or snopes.com. The only version of a birth certificate that would matter is one submitted to court and attested to as valid, under penalty of perjury, and subject to forensic examination.

It may be the case that Berg is completely wrong. If so, the Obama campaign could have submitted documentation to the court quashing this case. Instead, it has chosen to engage in a legal strategy of delay. Why would they do this if Obama's documentation were in order? Why would they only provide electronic (so far as I know) copies to friendly sources? Perhaps someone can explain that satisfactorily, but I cannot. >>>

Here's the Illuminati Productions video presenting Philip Berg, Former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania and lifelong Democrat, making his case:





- Files on Articles in "The Pomo White House" -